Controversy Erupts at Allen House Public School over Allegations of Bias and Nepotism in Model United Nations (MUN) Program

Kanpur: Serious allegations of bias and nepotism have surfaced regarding the selection process of judges for the Model United Nations (MUN) program scheduled to be held in the school's auditorium. Mohammad Sajid, the head of the school's MUN, has been accused of not maintaining transparency in selecting judges and allegedly favoring his acquaintances for the role.

Details of the Allegations: According to sources, MUN is a debate competition where experienced and qualified individuals from various fields are chosen as judges. However, Sajid reportedly kept this process secretive and did not make the list of selected judges public. As a result, several deserving and experienced participants were excluded from the selection.

Discontent within the School: There is significant discontent within the school regarding this matter. Some individuals within the school have claimed that Sajid favors certain students from the cleaning staff's line and wants to make them judges to assert their dominance in any program, not giving other participants a chance.

Sajid's Response: When asked about this matter, Sajid refused to give a satisfactory answer and instead said, "This time we were not able to select you." This behavior has disappointed students and their parents.

School Administration's Response: There is also no clarity from the school administration on this matter. Students say there should be transparency in the selection process and deserving participants should get a fair chance.

Impact on Society: This matter of Allen House Public School has raised serious questions of bias and nepotism in the field of education. It is hoped that the school administration will take appropriate action on this matter soon and ensure justice for all students.

According to sources close to the situation, a significant number of students have expressed dissatisfaction with the conduct of the core secretariat, accusing them of rudeness and a lack of experience in managing the proceedings effectively. These grievances have been amplified by allegations that the teacher in charge, purportedly favoring a specific candidate, has influenced the internal dynamics of the MUN.

"The core secretariat's behavior has been unacceptable. They seem inexperienced and have shown bias towards certain delegates," remarked one student who preferred to remain anonymous, citing instances where procedural errors and dismissive attitudes were observed

The controversy has sparked debate within the APSR MUN community, with some participants questioning the integrity of the electoral process and the overall management of the conference. Supporters of the favored candidate have been particularly vocal in their criticism, alleging that the teacher in charge has allowed internal politics to overshadow the principles of fairness and transparency.