US, Pakistan React to UP's Kanwar Yatra: 10 Key Points

US State Department Awareness
The US State Department has acknowledged awareness of the controversial Kanwar Yatra directives issued by BJP-ruled states and the subsequent interim stay order by the Indian Supreme Court.

Supreme Court's Interim Stay
On July 22, the Indian Supreme Court issued an interim stay on the implementation of directives requiring eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route to display owner and staff details. This effectively halted the directives from taking effect.

Engagement with Indian Counterparts
The US has engaged with Indian officials to emphasize the importance of equal treatment for all religious communities in response to the directives' concerns.

Pakistani Journalist's Allegations
During a press briefing, a Pakistani journalist alleged that the BJP government was pressuring Muslim restaurant owners to display their religious identity, raising international concerns.

US Commitment to Religious Freedom
US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller reiterated the commitment to promoting and protecting universal respect for religious freedom and belief globally.

Court’s Observation on Food Standards
The Supreme Court has indicated that eateries might be required to display the type of food served (vegetarian or non-vegetarian) but did not support the religious identity display directive.

Lack of State Government Representation
On the day of the Supreme Court hearing, no representatives from the state governments appeared, prompting further scrutiny of the directives.

Controversy Over Directive Implementation
The directives had faced backlash for potentially infringing on religious freedoms and causing discriminatory practices.

Judicial Experience Shared
Justice SVN Bhatti shared a personal anecdote highlighting the importance of food quality and safety over the owner's religion, underscoring the focus on standards rather than religious identity.

Ongoing Investigation
The Supreme Court's decision to issue a stay and the lack of state representation indicate ongoing legal and administrative review of the directives' implications.